Is It Time To Change The Earned Income Tax Credit?

Gina Deveney
Posted by in Accounting, Auditing & Tax


The earned income tax credit allows low-income Americans to recoup some of their income tax amount so long as they keep working. This credit, at a glance, appears to be a way to reward people who don't earn a lot of money, letting them pay less taxes or even get a larger refund after filing a return.

Unfortunately, the earned income tax credit leads to billions of dollar of fraud each year due to improper payments. Instead of encouraging low-income people to find work, some accountants and IRS officials feel as if the credit creates a sense of entitlement as an anti-poverty program. The statistics behind this issue bear this out in stark ways.

During the 2013 tax year, a record number of tax filers applied the earned income tax credit to the tune of $68 billion. Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of the Treasury estimates between $16 and $19 billion of this credit went to improper payments, and as many as 25 percent of early filers that took the credit did so illegally. This amounts to defrauding the federal government. Accountants at firms have pointed out solutions to the massive fraud problem, whereas an accounting retail chain proposed an alternate solution.

One tax preparer in California, Roger Lubiens of RS Tax Service, suggests one way to lessen the fraud is to stop payments to foreign addresses. Laurie Ziegler, of Sass Accounting LLC in Wisconsin, believes some of her clients expect to receive the earned income tax credit every year, while other taxpayers are very surprised when they receive the extra funds from the IRS. Some of these people that expect to receive the credit find ways around tax laws to get it.

Some accountants offer solutions that range from eliminating the earned income tax credit altogether to prorating the tax return payment over 12 months rather than refunding the entire amount all at once. When the proposed federal budget came out in 2015, the Obama administration proposed making the credit available to up to 14 million American workers. The expansion of the credits could exacerbate — rather than solve — the ongoing fraud problem. Outright elimination might seem unfair to low-income taxpayers who deserve the credit, but making the form more complex could make tax preparation a luxury item that low-income families cannot afford.

H&R Block proposes making the earned income credit tax form more complicated. Ziegler notes that tax franchise owners saw clients lie about self-employment just to receive the credit in tax filings. This means some taxpayers game the system enough to not work hard and actually try to take the credit.

This is where paid preparers come into play. When more Americans seek the help of preparers, each preparer should take a due-diligence test for this tax credit. After taking the exam, preparers know exactly what to look for when filing someone's return. The IRS already has an exam in place for preparers — who face $500 in fines for each tax return filed improperly — but not everyone must take the test.

The earned income tax credit represents a way for hard-working Americans to take home a little extra money at tax time. Any solutions to fraudulent practices within this system rest with politicians who can change the tax code.


Photo courtesy of kittijaroon at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

 

Comment

Become a member to take advantage of more features, like commenting and voting.

  • Nancy Anderson
    Nancy Anderson

    @Deborah thanks for your comment. So very true as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Same as it's always been. It's just that today things are so instantaneous - we hear about it right as it's happening and not days, weeks or months later like we did before the Internet and mobile devices. So true about the loopholes for upper 1%. Time will tell how this plays out. It will be interesting to see how many "tests" are actually taken.

  • Deborah Swaitkewich
    Deborah Swaitkewich

    This is the same old argument. Anything that helps low income people is termed a rip off. First of all, I don't understand how this is helping people not work and live off the government as you have stated they can only claim this if they keep working. I don't know where these so called cheating figures come from, but I am sure they are exaggerated. Why don't you mention all the loop holes the rich have to keep from paying taxes. Whatever low income people get from this credit is a drop in the bucket compared to all the crooked breaks rich clients get. They continually keep from paying millions, billions in the case of large corporations, they rightfully should be paying.

Jobs to Watch