Pros and Cons of a Background Check

Julie Shenkman
Posted by in Career Advice


First, What Is Background Checking? As the name suggest, it is the process of scrutinizing the personal history of a person. This is done by consulting official and commercial records. In the past, one can do a background search by enlisting the aid of the police. Today though, private companies offer to do background search on people for a fee. Background checking is usually done when a person applies for a job especially a delicate one. Usually, employers would hire people they can trust and if that means checking the background of participants, they would do it. The necessity of a background check is even more pronounced when a person applies for a sensitive position, such as jobs which will put them in close contact with children and the elderly. People who are applying for government posts also undergo background checks. The Why Consider these figures and you will see why it is important for companies and the government to employ background checks: - 1 in 32 grownups in the United States has a criminal record - There are about 6 million threats of violence in the workplace every year - 2 million workplace assaults happen every year - 13 people die every week as a result of workplace violence - 36 percent of applications are falsified With those reasons, it is not surprising that companies do background check on applicants. There are jobs where a person is required to work around sensitive information especially in the government and that is another reason to run a background check on people applying for government posts. The Why Not While there are a lot of valid reasons for companies to check the background of applicants they are interested in hiring, there are also several factors why some companies forego this process. One reason is that it takes some time and money to do a background check. Thus, small companies tend to give up background checking. On the other end of the spectrum, some employees are against background checking believing that it is a form of invasion of privacy. Another reason being put forward by people opposed to background checking is that people might not be able to land a good job for doing something stupid during their youth. Another could be the belief that a background check could result to illegal discrimination based on the past of a person or the people he or she is associated with in the past. Written by: George Foerstel George Foerstel is a Human Resource officer for a large company. He has worked for several companies and has gained vast amount of information regarding background check and other subjects. He resides in New York, New York presently and focuses on sharing his knowledge to other people through writing. Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/human-resources-articles/pros-and-cons-of-a-background-check-486429.html
Comment

Become a member to take advantage of more features, like commenting and voting.

  • Pat R
    Pat R
    I think background checks should be done, but not past 10 yrs. My son is loosing his job now of 8 yrs. because a new company bought the old company out who didn't do background checks. The old company knew of his background but hired him. He's been an outstanding person in the job field of construction with many letters of praise from co-workers and customers but the new company did a background check for 99 yrs back & is now terminating him because he did something really stupid when he was 18yrs. old. He already served his time
  • Deborah
    Deborah
    It is no doubt that we living in a world that is full of threat. Background checking can be a good solution to find a reliable and honest employee.Regards,Deborah.
  • Background Check
    Background Check
    For me i am favor  that every employee or candidates should first undergone background check. Who knows if he has a criminal background. Spending money for this is worth while because if you will think for the expenses that background checking can have but you have those filtered employee, trust worthy employee much better rather than you will just hire them and at the end you will be the loser.
  • Shawn
    Shawn
    Unfortunately for many, as David has posted above, there is no "statute of limitations" that prevents an employer from going back as far as they want to when checking someone's background.
  • Rissa
    Rissa
    This comment is for David that had been treated wrongly. I read an article about background checking and it says that a felony done after 7 years is not supposed to be included. Correct me if I'm wrong. You can read it yourself.Here's the linkhttp://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs16-bck.htm
  • JEF
    JEF
    COMING FROM A FOREIGN COUNTRY LOOKING AT THE WAYS PRIVATE INTEREST TREAT PEOPLE IN THE USA, THAT IS LIKE LOOKING AT A CONCENTRATION CAMP IN 1943 IN NAZI GERMANY!!!! WHEN WILL PEOPLE WAKE UP TO END THIS EVIL SYSTEM!!!??
  • David
    David
    I lost a 9 year job when coworkers went and found out that I was the only manager in the company that had felony for a stupid thing I did more than 10 years ago. Now 80% of all companies are running a background check on me and I cannot find anyone that will even look at me. I was promoted 4 times at my last job and didn't miss a day of work for 5 years. I just get sorted out in a pile that says no way.There is no law against discriminating against Felons!
  • You Might Also Be Interested In

article posted by Staff Editor in Career Advice
article posted by Staff Editor in Career Advice

Jobs to Watch