Are Retailers Abusing Young Workers with Scheduling?

Posted by in Retail


It wasn’t the new fall styles that drew crowds of people to the sidewalks of New York City's posh Fifth Avenue shopping district last Wednesday. Workers from major companies like Abercrombie & Fitch, Best Buy and Wal-Mart joined together to protest employment practices that they dub as abusive.

 

One particular practice that ignited the fervor fueling the protests is known as “on-call scheduling.” Bintou Kamara, a 22-year-old cashier, started a petition on Change.org that was mobilized into last week’s protest by the Retail Action Project. Kamara explains, “'On-Call’ shifts mean we have to call the store two hours before the shift to ask if they need us. Nine times out of ten, they tell us not to come in, but Abercrombie still demands our open availability.” She also highlighted how the unpredictable scheduling at Abercrombie & Fitch, among other places, made it difficult for employees to support themselves or even find supplemental work. 

 

Kamara and her co-workers enjoyed schedules of up to 33 hours a week when they were first hired, but as time went by, their hours dwindled to 5 hours a week or less. Some of those hours included on-call shifts that didn’t pan out, leaving giant gaps in work from week to week. Kamara felt that Abercrombie & Fitch added insult to injury as they continued to hire new associates despite the lack of enough hours available to sustain their current staff’s schedules. "They feel like we can't do anything, we can't fight back and it's a big company," she said.

 

The problem just seems to be getting worse. Alvin Ramnarain, Executive Vice President at RWDSU Local 1102 asserts, “Retailers are pioneering the worst trends in retail. With on-call scheduling, many within the retail industry are creating a class of contingent workers who are more akin to day laborers than employees.”

 

The law is still murky when it comes to the tumultuous retail scheduling practices trending today. According to the Retail Action Project, “Legal analysis of “waiting pay” (as defined by the Fair Labor Standards Act – FLSA), hasn’t caught up with the brave new world of on-call scheduling, but these unpaid waiting days may run afoul of basic FLSA protections.” While this sort of scheduling typically turns out to be more inconvenient than illegal, in some instances there are boundaries slowly being crossed that are exploiting retail employees.

 

Laws vary from state to state but in New York State, where the protests where held, there is a call-in pay law. It requires retail employers to pay their workers at the minimum wage for either 4 hours or the full extent of the scheduled shift, whichever is less, even if employees aren’t required to come in because of poor store traffic. Many employees who are called off or sent home early never see any pay beyond actual hours worked.

 

In Maryland, ABC News reports that a former Best Buy employee, 23-year-old Ricah Norman, had to quit school because she couldn’t support herself working two part-time jobs. Scheduling between classes and work shifts clashed, causing a constant source of stress, and something had to give. When Norman tried to talk to her supervisors she was basically told, “That's the way the business is.”

 

Frustrated by the cycle, Norman says, "Retailers in general need to get back to the days when they scheduled people a correct amount of hours and allowed them to have a personal life while supporting families with sufficient wages and hours, instead of revolving their lives around the companies.”

 

Some think unionizing is the answer. “Retail workers are facing a new level of uncertainty,” said Cassandra Berrocal, President of RWDSU Local 3, which represents more than 2,000 sales clerks, shelf stockers and clerical workers at Bloomingdale’s flagship 59th Street store. “Through the power of our union, RWDSU Local 3, workers have achieved scheduling rights that elevate the bar for scheduling standards in retail. While retailers like Abercrombie are making workers wait by the phone, unionized Bloomingdale’s workers have guaranteed hours, advanced notice of their scheduling and their scheduled shifts are respected and honored by their managers.”

 

Source image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Comment

Become a member to take advantage of more features, like commenting and voting.

  • Jenean C
    Jenean C
    It is the employers job to keep the business solvent. If we pay people to stand around when there is not enough business to support labor costs, then the business looses money. More of us low-level workers need to find a way to acquire skills that allow us to command a better wage.
  • jenny d
    jenny d
    I work at a popular retailer too and until I was lucky enough to get promoted to full time I also had to call in. It was and is very disturbing. I'm glad these people have come forward to fight for this important issue.
  • Alex B
    Alex B
    Yeah! I empathize Dollar General does similar things to senior employees, cuts our schedules to "stay within budget" but hires new employees to fill gaps.  It's all economics.  Get more for less.  But it doesn't work they lose on the quality of work side to gain a body and spend less in payroll.  Also Turnover becomes rampant as job dissatisfaction increases, costing companies more in the long run.
  • C. J
    C. J
    I was just hired as of the 9th of Oct, and my employer decided to fire me two weeks later because she didn't like me behind the lies she fronted as being (Our personalities are clashing too much). When I got hired I explained that I was having a very bad time finding a jobs that I could fill and how loyal and of a good worker I was. When she fired me-it left me feeling she didn't care nothing at all about hardship for me as a job seeker and that she wasn't human and wasn't concerned with whether I was going to make it or not. Or that my wages were low still on the fact that my hours were very few. The thing about it is she didn't look as some big time manager or supervisor, that's the type I would expect to get this type of treatment. NO. She seemed under the radar (if you know what I mean) to be treating a decent hard work employee that value his work. WHAT IS GOING ON?????
  •  ellen
    ellen
    I am very happy to find that article!! I am retail job, and I wonder have regular shifts to have time for my family and make some money to survive!! This kind of treatment with employees is not fair at all!! The huge corporations are abusive and soulless, they treat retail employees like slaves!!!
  • Kathryn Q
    Kathryn Q
    I worked for New York & Co and they did the on-call scheduling every week and dwindled my hours so I quit. I was working 2 part-time jobs, as so many people do now.Retail is a thankless job...either long hours and poor pay or no hours!  My friend works at Olive Garden as a hostess and same thing.... Cut shifts and no hours. We are both divorced,   hip 50 year olds.  Thank you.
  • Lorri D
    Lorri D
    It's not just the younger workers. The longer you work for a company the closer you are to the front door. I've worked for a large retailer for 34 years. I was 4 points (2 years )for full benefits.  When I was let go. Job reduction. Up until then we required to work 2-11 one night and be back at 7-4 in the morning.
  • Susan K
    Susan K
    There needs to be more regulation to protect the employees - hourly and salary.  Retailers are taking advantage of salaried employees(namely: assistant managers).  Working 60 + hours a week to make up for the lack of hours allocated for the hourly associates.  Thus the assistant managers work for less per hour than the hourly.  Granted there are perks to hourly - but there needs to be limitations.  I believe that KMart pays their assistant managers salary assessed on an a 40 hour week to regulate abuse.  We need more of this regulation for all salary associates.Thank you,Susan
  • Thomas M
    Thomas M
    ckeck this out :Old school  ways worked then and work nowthere is a stair step schedule technique that is correct fo this situation to handle cust peaks and valleys.
  • Marilyn B
    Marilyn B
    How can a person pay their bills on time with that kind of scheduling? This is a new form of slavery. Employers expect loyalty from their workers, yet refuse to commit to them with a firm schedule. The "waiting pay" law needs to be enforced.
  • Denis S
    Denis S
    I agree with the article and have experienced scheduling insanity  at Home Depot for the last 3 years. As a part time employee the only way to get hours is full availability from 6 am till 11 pm. A new micro managing manager came a year ago and extended it from 5 am until midnight for full availability.  I am no longer there.
  • Rene H
    Rene H
    My daughter works for Justice in California and is experiencing the same scheduling problem. Fortunately right now she lives at home, so she has no bills other than gas for her car and her "going out" money.  But with this schedule she will never be able to save enough to move out and experience being out on her own until she has a full time job.When I was her same age, I was able to go to school and work a guaranteed 30 hour part-time job. I shared an apartment with 2 other girls until I got married. It was a wonderful time of growing up and wish all children could have exposure to.
  • Rick R
    Rick R
    Abuse is rampant in a number of industries. I have experienced it in other fields as well. You get hired to work 25, 30 or 33 hours the  hours begin to dwindle down to around 6. This was not a retail position. Moved from the job you were hired for into a job you didn't want to begin with but told we need you in this position, if you don't like find another job.
  • Heather Fairchild
    Heather Fairchild
    I completely agree, Grace. The best way to get the best performance out of employees is to treat them the best and great employees generate great business.
  • Grace T
    Grace T
    Crazy hours and low-pay, retailers should be ashamed as their employees actually drive the business to success or not.

Jobs to Watch